Exclusion Clauses Essay

oer the past few decades, with the development of compress law, more and more passel has paid attention to the exception articles hazardtracked in a entry which is subscribe by the parties. Many embraceing parties use this technique to parry financial obligation for breach of contract. In this essay, exclusion clauses tummy be defined as a clause included in a contract to every limit or exclude liability of a party in breach of the agreement. (also termed unsusceptibility clauses or franchise clauses. ) Consequently, it is argued that whether the party impart be spring by the franchise clause which is peculiarityalise by the parties or non.Therefore, this essay volition analyze the exemption clause with signature ground on several court incases and ornament the effect of an unsigned exemption clause by using a short hypothetical scenario and a court case. Signed Exclusion clauses As a general rule, a someone who signs a schedule which contains contractual terms is bound by the clause of the memorial. To be specific, if a party signs a contractual text file incorporating an exemption clause, it lead automatically form part of the contract. Therefore, Signature can ordinarily bind a someone to the terms charge if he has non read or understood the terms set come in in the document.What has come to be known as the principle in LEstrange v Graucob was expressed by Scrutton LJ as take places When a document containing contractual terms is signed, then, in the absence of fraud, or, I will add, misrepresentation, the party signing it is bound, and it is wholly immaterial whether he has read the document or non. According to the case of LEstrange v Graucob 1934 2 KB 394, the complainant bought an automatic cigargontte machine from the suspects. She signed a contract called sales agreement which include several clauses, but did not read.When she discovered the machine was defective, she tried to sue Graucob for breach of contract, but the defendant was able to rely on the exclusion clause incorporated into the write contract. From this case, it can be seen that since the complainant has signed the sales agreement, the contract and the exclusion clauses has taken effect. In addition, the contents of the document were represented correctly and no fraud on the part of the defendants. Therefore, L Estrange is bound by the exclusion clauses. However, the rule in L Estrange v Graucob will not apply under whatever deal.Firstly, if the signed document could not reasonably be regarded in the circumstances as likely to contain contractual terms, the party will not be bound by the signature. In the case Le Mans Grand Prix Circuits Pty Ltd v Iliadis, the plaintiff was hurt while driving a go-cart at the defendants racing track. P was invited there as a guest to serve up the promotion of Ds go-kart track and did not pay for the attendance at the track. The defendant wanted to avoid liability by relying on an agreem ent, signed by the plaintiff which includes an exclusion clause.The count made a decision that the defendant was unable to rely on the exclusion clause so as to avoid liability. Because the plaintiff attended defendants track was not in pursuance of a commercial relations of relationship with the defendant. Thereby, the entry form was just a driver accommodation form, not a contract. In other word, the document which the plaintiff had signed was not contractual, although the agreement contained plaintiffs signature, he was not bound it because the signed document could not reasonably be regarded in the circumstances as likely to contain contractual terms.Secondly, a person who misrepresents the clause and its effect is not allowed to rely on the exemption clause to hightail it liability. The case of Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co all the way illustrate the legal position. In this case, Curtis took a wedding dress to the defendants shop to have it dry cleaned. The shop assistant asked her to sign a receipt, and the plaintiff was told by the shop assistant that the document was to exempt defendants from liability for damage to the beads and the sequins.The plaintiff signed the document, which in fact included a clause that the company is not apt for any damage howsoever arising. The dress was stained by the defendant who by and by tried to rely on the exclusion clause. The Court judged that the clause is not effective and the defendant cannot rely on it. Because in this case, the exclusion clause had been misrepresented as only beads and sequins would be affected. and the plaintiff perspective she was only running the risk of damage to the sequins and the beads on the dress. unsigned exclusion clausesIn our daily life, the exemption clause also contained in some unsigned document, such as tickets, invoices, receipts, vouchers and so on. Upon most situations, these unsigned documents may not be binding in contract unless they are properly include d into the contract. Although, Signature is the most common way to verify the effectiveness of a contract, that no nastys if you dont sign the form you could not be bound by it, in some particular cases it is. Firstly, a hypothetical scenario will be made to illustrate the effect of exclusion clause in an unsigned document.Alex had toothache seriously, he went to a pharmacy and bought a box of Panadol. Before he took the tablets he saw the introduction and even the container has written on that must follow the doctors advice, if you dont follow the advice, there is not liable for any harm of your body but he didnt care about the warning and take three tablets. On the chase day, Alex felt dizzy and nausea. After the diagnosis from doctor, it can be considered that these sign due to the effect of medicine. Then, Alex sued the medicine company.Under this situation, the defendant can avoid liability by exemption clause even though Alex did not sign the document. As the common law sai d that exclusion clauses contained in unsigned documents are not valid unless a fairish person would expect the document to contain contractual document and a reasonable notice is given. In this case, contractual terms can be evaluate to find from the introduction and container of the medicine. In addition, company also takes reasonable go to bring these clauses to Alexs notice.Thus, the plaintiff was already bound by the exemption clauses. Another court case for the unsigned exclusion clause is the case of Parker v South Eastern Railway Co, plaintiff left his lulu at cloakroom in a railway station and he got a ticket. On the front of the ticket said See back, the other side include an exclusion clause which shows that company will only be responsible for the value of package within 10 pounds. When the bag could not be found, Parker sued the company for 2410 pounds.However the court judged that the plaintiff was bound by the exclusion clause on the ticket even though he did not sign it. Because the company has already gave the plaintiff sufficient notice of the existence of the clause and a reasonable person would expect to find these terms. According to the basic principle in contract law which said that the unsigned exemption clause will be bound if reasonable notice has been given. Conclusion To sum up, exclusion clause can be classified as signed document and unsigned document in this essay.When considerate the effectiveness of a clause, every aspects should be analyzed. Although the signature is an important factor to prove if the clause is valid, it does not mean that all the exclusion clauses included in a signed document can be bound with a signer. To the contrary, the exemption clause in an unsigned document can also be valid in some situation. Therefore, any party who wish rely on the exemption clause to avoid liability should incorporate the clause into a contract with sufficient notice and make sure the behaviors of the party is reasonable.