Classic Pen Case

ACC 341 perfect Pen Case Assignment You should hand in iodin knave of depth psychology and ii sets of funding calculation. The first supporting calculation is an alphabet system for definitive Pen, constructed by filling in the blanks in the adjacent table. First allocate the total ex frameses in each row to the heterogeneous activities, based on information in the case. Then choose a cost driver and calculate the score per unit of the cost driver. Activities catalogue & Handle Production RunsSet up MachinesKeep Product RecordsRun MachinesTotal Ex savesesIn cultivate sweat & l sign up fringes14,00011,2002,800$28,000* Computer systems$8,000$2,000$10,000 Machinery8,000$ 8,000 Maintenance4,000$ 4,000 Energy2,000$ 2,000 Total activity be22,00011,2004,80014,000 52,000 Cost driver of runsSetup prison termDL HoursMachine Hours Total measurement of cost driver150 runs (Exhibit 2)526 hours200010,000 Allocation rate per unit of cost driver146. 6721. 292. 401. 40 *This includes fractional of the $16,000 fringe benefits. The other half is associated with direct weary dont forget to include it in your ABC income statementThe second supporting calculation is an ABC income statement showing sales revenue negatively charged each type of direct and verifying cost assigned to the quaternity pen types. Add two lines at the bottom of the income statement one line shows the operating expediency per unit for each type of pen based on your ABC calculations, and the other line shows the operating cyberspace per unit based on the traditional-income calculations in Exhibit 1 of the case. The analysis consists of answers to the following questions (about one-half page each). a)Your ABC analysis should show that discolour pens are very unprofitable, while savoury pens earn most of the grinds profits. One of the managers at Classic Pen questions your analysis, saying, I fuckt believe thithers that much difference in profit per unit between the blue and olympia n pens. Purple pens move for ten cents much than blue pens, and material costs are precisely five cents higher. Labor and machine-hour costs are exactly the same, setup epoch per run is the same, and we however do twelve production runs for purple pens, compa red ink to 50 for blue pens. So how can the profits be that different? spare a paragraph explaining why per-unit profit is so much frown for purple than for blue pens. In the traditional income statement, operating cost costs and indirect ram costs were not linked to the specific products that used them in the process of producing them. They were simply allocated to each uniquely glowering pen by the amount of sales they generated, which didnt take into account the amount of funds and time that was played out on making them. This caused direct labor costs to be spread out among the products, regardless of how much the cost of producing them was.In the second income statement that was created in the problem, instead of basing these costs on sales they were based upon certain drivers, such as the arrive of runs and the amount of time preparing the machine and reports done for each product. This helped to allocate the costs of indirect labor and operating expense specifically to the products that were using these resources, helping to give a more realistic picture of the revenue generated for a certain color pen versus the costs spent making them.The purple pens had high shade standards that they had to meet, which involve a large amount of time spent on preparing the machines for their runs. It is this relatively large amount spent on indirect labor for purple pens, not the material costs, that causes them to turn such a level profit than the blue pens. (b)The current command processing overhead allocation rate at Classic is 300% of direct labor. A few years ago it was only about 200%. In the Bridgeton case we saw the overhead rate going up because products were dropped, and volume (and di rect labor) went down while indomitable overhead costs remained. But that is clearly not the case hereAt Classic, new products have been added, and production volumes have gone up. If overhead costs are variable, the increase in volume and direct labor would increase total overhead costs but not the overhead rate. If overhead costs are fixed, the increase in volume and direct labor would leave total overhead costs unchanged and reduce the rate. So how can it be that the overhead rate has been increasing at Classic? Write a concise explanation. When Classic only had two different colored pens, overhead allocation rate was much lower because the number of direct labor hours making the products was lower than when the new products were added.As stated in the case, the amount of time spent on preparing the machines for producing the blue colored ink for pens was less demanding than that of purple or red. For the black colored ink used in the pens, the amount of direct labor spent prep aring the machines was nearly non-existent because the vats didnt need much killing out by and by switching from blue ink, as it did not really affect the quality of the ink color. By adding just two more ink colors, red and purple, the number of direct labor hours significantly increased, which also increased the overhead rate because production was largely increased.The additional colors increased the number of times the vats needed to be emptied out in order to furbish up and produce all the different colors of ink, which added on to the direct labor hours. The red and purple inks also did not disguise residual ink left in the vat nearly as well as the black ink could, so not only were the emptying the vats more often, they were spending a great deal more time cleaning them out in order to meet the color quality standards needed in order to sell the pens.