"Of Mice and Men" vs "The Pearl"

The aspect of the John Steinbeck novels, The Pearl and Of Mice and Men, that is most comparable to(predicate) is how, in both books, Steinbeck denies the main characters of each book, Kino and George and Lennie to change their piece in aliveness or to beat fate. Steinbecks morose outlook of life was perhaps brought on with his proterozoic failures and poverty, because exclusively three of the pre-mentioned characters had opportunities to change their fate or social power but failed. The elements of discussion are Kino, George and Lennie, a compari news and a contrast. Kino found one of the most valuable and curious pearls in the world and be convinced of its worth was non outlet to be cheated by only minimally upgrading his designate of life. quite he wanted to break the fixed life and role that he and his family had and always would live. Kino refuses the maximum ply of fifteen hundred pesos that would easily ease his and his familys pain and measly for the feel er months. Kino is then situated to trek to the nifty to convey a fair and just offer. Kino continues determined through the mountains after an attempt at the pearl, his canoe done for(p) and his sea chantey set a blaze. Continuing to sit his familys life on the line.

It eventually takes the death of his beloved son Coyotito to make him spot he needs to stop being so greedy, no matter how hard he tries and to keep out his mouth and bonk his role. George and Lennie have to continue to move or so the country expression for puddle until Lennie screws up again. The instability of work only makes it that ove rmuch harder for them to complete their drea! m of a elicit of their own. Candys participation in the dream of the farm... If you want to get a full essay, place it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper